[probonopd]

Repository: https://github.com/M0xoo/wisp

Run Claude Code, Codex and other coding agents in parallel, in the background, and read a one-screen report instead of the transcript.

• Stars: 9
• Release with the AppImage: v0.57.0 (2026-11-03T07:34:07Z)
• AppImage asset: wisp-linux-x64.AppImage
• License: MIT

Found by .github/workflows/discover-apps.yml, which looks for GitHub
repositories that publish AppImages but are not in the catalog yet. This
entry was not tested by a human; please review it before merging.

[github-actions]

✅ Test passed

@M0xoo: this pull request adds the AppImage from your GitHub repository to the AppImage catalog; the test reports the following. Could you have a look?

Please check that the screenshot shows the application's main window.

wisp

Tested:

• wisp-linux-x64.AppImage from release v0.57.0

Compatibility: not self-contained: uses the C library of the system; uses an old AppImage runtime that needs the C library (and libfuse2) of the system; references glibc 2.25

Names:

WARNING: AppImage name 'wisp-linux-x64.AppImage': should not contain 'Linux', since all AppImages are for Linux (e.g. 'App-1.0-x86_64.AppImage', not 'App-1.0-linux-x86_64.AppImage')

Notes:

• File name 'wisp': all-lowercase names are typically used for command line tools, but the desktop file does not set Terminal=true. If this is a graphical application, please name the file after the application as it is spelled, with capitals where it has them (e.g. 'Krita'); if it is a command line tool, set Terminal=true in its desktop file.

Warnings:

• Please check the remarks about the names below.
• The AppImage contains no update information, so users cannot update it with AppImageUpdate or similar tools. Please consider embedding it when building the AppImage (e.g., appimagetool -u) and publishing the .zsync file next to the AppImage; see https://docs.appimage.org/packaging-guide/optional/updates.html

Commit 2f57f45. Full log

[M0xoo]

Maintainer of wisp here. Confirmed, this is our official AppImage (v0.57.0). The screenshot is the real app, but at 796px wide it falls below our 900px breakpoint and shows the compact one-column layout. If the test can run at >=1280x800, it would show the normal split view. Happy either way, thanks for adding it!