Skip to content

fix: preserve safe network diagnostics through budget recovery - #258

Merged
DavidHLP merged 4 commits into
codex/acceptance-v12-bindingfrom
codex/guard-network-diagnostics
Oct 11, 2026
Merged

DavidHLP merged 4 commits into
codex/acceptance-v12-bindingfrom
codex/guard-network-diagnostics

Conversation

@DavidHLP

@DavidHLP DavidHLP commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

A real development evaluation stopped on a network/read failure, but wrapping the transport exception erased its diagnostic type. Preserve a safe diagnostic in newly written failure receipts while retaining the full unknown-liability envelope and blocking every later request.

Record only four exact native HTTPX connection/read error or timeout type names; every other exception, including a custom HTTPX subclass, becomes transport_failure. Never persist exception messages, URLs or request contents. Existing halt reasons and retry behavior remain unchanged. Update the canonical development guide and bound corpus digest.

Recovery accepts this optional field using the same five fixed strings. Legacy receipts may omit it; all other types and values remain rejected. This fixes the recovery-schema incompatibility raised in review.

Validation at f047619d6053ca834a8f197f226dae72ea585ac7:

  • Remote recovery test-first regression: 5 failed, 8 passed, 61 deselected.
  • Remote focused guard/budget/history/corpus regression: 242 passed in 29.02 seconds.
  • Independent specification and standards/security reviews: APPROVE.
  • Exact-head CI run 38107060259: completed SUCCESS at f047619.

No paid calls or retrospective modification of historical failure evidence occurred. This improves diagnostics for future failures and does not resolve the existing unknown usage or constitute formal model acceptance.

@DavidHLP
DavidHLP marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2026 10:28
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-11T03:03:40.952892Z f047619 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: eb2587a9cc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread services/agent/src/dav58_live_guard.py
@DavidHLP DavidHLP changed the title fix: preserve safe network failure types in budget receipts fix: preserve safe network diagnostics through budget recovery Oct 11, 2026
@DavidHLP
DavidHLP merged commit f5163a2 into codex/acceptance-v12-binding Oct 11, 2026
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant