Repository navigation
fix(agent): define mutually exclusive judge behavior categories - #264
Merged
DavidHLP merged 3 commits intoOct 11, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The development judge's behavior descriptions overlapped: a cited explanation saying a code line cannot be identified could be classified as cite, no_evidence or refuse, although the artifact requires a single label.
Define explicit precedence refuse > clarify > no_evidence > cite and exclude higher-priority behaviors from each lower category. A citation never overrides refusal, clarification or insufficient evidence. Include a cited-refusal example and regression through the existing public evaluator; preserve its answer, citation/support/completion and returned refusal label. Existing mismatch recording remains unchanged: labels are never rewritten to match expected behavior.
Addresses PR #254 thread PRRT_kwDORHwl-s6rC0ri. Update canonical documentation and its bound corpus version. Depends on PR #263.
Validation at 9aa2d69:
No live-model compliance, paid calls or formal U02/U03/U04 acceptance is claimed. This changes the prompt contract and deterministic round-trip coverage; real classification evidence remains required. Remote wrapper line-ending normalization is unrelated and preserved.