geometric-function-atlas is a standalone Python package for independently reproducing and reviewing computations published by the Geometric Function Atlas.
Source repository: https://github.com/Prasanna28Devadiga/geometric-function-atlas
This repository is intentionally separate from the registry website and its research workspace. It provides local commands and Python functions for reproducing the website's mathematical computations. It does not contain the Flask application, deployment configuration, private review state, or mutable registry database.
No Python required. On macOS or Linux, run:
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -LsSf https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Prasanna28Devadiga/geometric-function-atlas/main/scripts/install.sh | shOn Windows, open PowerShell and run:
irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Prasanna28Devadiga/geometric-function-atlas/main/scripts/install.ps1 | iexThen take the guided tour:
gfa walkthrough
These commands use the package repository's installers (the website-hosted
installer endpoints are maintained separately). Both scripts install the immutable
published v0.7.0 wheel and create the gfa command with a uv-managed Python;
they do not require a preinstalled Python. The
getting-started guide
walks through the first calculations.
Every operation represented in the package's parity table has a local command and a Python function. The table below is the complete shipped surface; browser- only panels and private research-workspace operations are explicit non-goals.
| Website capability | CLI | Python function |
|---|---|---|
| Run a concise first-use tour | gfa walkthrough |
— |
| Browse the generator catalog (39 keys; 38 distinct formulas) | gfa generators |
list_generators() |
| Exact Taylor coefficients of a generator | gfa coefficients <gen> --order N |
generator_series() |
| Exact Ma–Minda Fekete–Szegő constants | gfa fekete-szego <gen> --mu M |
fekete_szego() |
| Versioned coefficient tables (H₃ lower witnesses; sharp a₃ and a₂a₃) | `gfa coefficient-table hankel3_1 | a3 |
| Re-check a supplied counterexample witness | gfa verify-counterexample |
verify_counterexample() |
| Search for and certify a violation point | gfa find-counterexample |
find_counterexample() |
| Verify a function at a cost tier | gfa verify --max-cost <tier> |
verify_function() |
| List Ma–Minda classes | gfa classes |
list_classes() |
| Check Ma–Minda admissibility of a class | gfa class-check <key> |
class_admissibility() |
| Screen membership of f in a class | gfa class-member <key> --coefficients ... |
class_member_screen() |
| Screen class containment | gfa compare <inner> <outer> |
class_containment_screen() |
| Exact extremal coefficients of a class | gfa extremal-coefficients <key> |
class_extremal_coefficients() |
| Export citations | gfa citation ... |
citation_export() |
| Reproduce website plots | gfa plot <kind> <gen> [--object phi|z*phi|f_phi] --output out.svg (domain also supports PNG/TikZ) |
write_plot() and friends |
| Inspect/verify baked scientific artifacts | gfa artifact-snapshot, gfa proofs, gfa expansion, gfa coefficient-bound, gfa reconciliation |
snapshot_info(), list_proofs(), expansion(), coefficient_bound(), reconciliation() |
| Replay a baked exact certificate | gfa verify-certificate <name> |
verify_certificate() |
| Browse/replay directed inclusion radii | gfa radii, gfa radius, gfa radius-recompute, gfa radius-identify, gfa radius-audit, gfa radius-attainment, gfa verify-radius-certificate |
list_radii(), radius(), recompute_radius(), identify_radius(), audit_radius(), verify_radius_attainment(), verify_radius_certificate() |
| Verify/install an immutable registry snapshot | `gfa snapshot info | verify |
| Query snapshot statistics, families, papers, evidence, applications, legacy functions, facets, and tags | `gfa stats | search |
| Query aliases, hierarchy, and stored witnesses | `gfa aliases | normalize-class |
| Cryptography Lab S-box metrics (optional) | gfa crypto-lab ... |
geometric_function_atlas.lab.* |
| Image Lab finite coefficient-derived filters, metrics, and transforms (optional) | gfa image-lab ... |
geometric_function_atlas.lab.* |
The built-in catalog has 39 catalog keys, 38 distinct generator formulas:
janowski_A0_B-1 and order_0.5 both equal 1/(1-z) exactly. Both keys
remain supported for historical radius records and source locators; they are
not independent mathematical generators. The directed-radius snapshot is
alias-inclusive; see the count reconciliation.
Result-printing commands accept --json for machine-readable output;
file-writing commands (plot, image-lab transform, image-lab sample)
write their artifact instead. Without --json, result commands print a short
human summary (the value plus its evidence label) and point to --json for
the complete versioned record.
Short aliases save typing: gfa coeffs, gfa fs, gfa disprove, and
gfa certify stand for coefficients, fekete-szego,
verify-counterexample, and verify-radius-certificate. A misspelled
generator key earns a did you mean ...? suggestion, and witness points may
use fraction syntax with --at (gfa disprove --coefficients 1 --at=-3/4).
Low-level exact research helpers also include inverse_coefficients([a2,...,a5])
for formal inverse jets and schippers_origin([a2,a3,a4]) for the classical
Schwarzian and next Schippers invariant at the origin. They return exact
SymPy tuples, not global bounds, inverse-domain certificates or disk norms.
For example, the Koebe jet [2,3,4,5] gives inverse (-2,5,-14,42);
its initial Schippers invariants are (-6,48).
schwarzian_derivative_origin([a2,a3,a4]) instead returns the ordinary
derivative S_f'(0)=24*(a4-2*a2*a3+a2**3). For Koebe it is zero, not sigma4=48.
Exactly three exact coefficients are required. This scalar low-level API proves
no disk norm, global univalence, sharp bound, or whole-paper result.
hadamard_coefficients(left, right) computes exact coefficientwise products of
normalized jets a2..a9 (equal nonempty lengths, at most eight terms). Unknown
tails are never zero-padded. This API is not ordinary multiplication and proves
no global convolution theorem or class membership; see
bounded Hadamard jets.
The package does not bundle the mutable registry database, and no canonical snapshot URL is bundled.
Snapshot users provide a user-supplied HTTPS database and matching manifest
(the manifest can preserve its source_url), then verify
and install it locally:
gfa snapshot install https://example.org/registry.sqlite \
~/.cache/gft-registry/registry.sqlite --manifest registry.manifest.json
gfa papers --citation 10.example/record \
--snapshot ~/.cache/gft-registry/registry.sqlite --manifest registry.manifest.jsonThe URL above is an illustrative caller input, not a package-hosted release asset. Snapshot hashes, required tables, populations, and SQLite integrity checks are authoritative; a snapshot does not certify the underlying claims.
The optional crypto lab covers five named registry functions and two
deterministic S-box constructions. Its outputs are benchmark metrics, never
security claims; invertibility and empirical comparisons do not amount to
provable cryptographic security. leaderboard(scope="website") and
gfa crypto-lab leaderboard --scope website replay the immutable 435-row
website metric snapshot; those rows contain reported metrics, not S-box values,
and are not a new security ranking. The image lab is likewise an empirical
transform/metric sandbox. It accepts finite, non-empty 2D (H×W) or RGB
(H×W×3) arrays and exposes the finite coefficient-derived filter subset used
by the website's named functions. GMSD mirrors the website's 2×2 prefilter,
including its treatment of odd-sized inputs; the package does not claim analytic
special-function or conformal-warp parity.
For problem-led examples rather than an API tour, choose one of five research workflows: understand a Ma–Minda class, investigate a coefficient problem, prove an inclusion radius, test a conjecture, or reproduce and adapt a published result.
from geometric_function_atlas import Generator, generator_series, z
# phi(z) = 1 + sin(z) = 1 + z - z^3/6 + ...
series = generator_series("sine", order=4)
assert tuple(map(str, series.coefficients)) == (
"1", "0", "-1/6", "0"
)
print(series.to_dict())Custom normalized generators use preconstructed SymPy expressions; formula strings are deliberately rejected rather than passed to an eval-based parser:
custom = Generator(
key="custom",
name="Example",
expression=1 + 2*z + 3*z**2,
citation="User supplied",
)Computations are not restricted to the built-in catalog. Analytic admissibility
of custom input remains an explicit caller assumption, and undeclared free
symbols are rejected. Caller definitions receive a collision-safe canonical
identity of the form user:<key>:<SHA-256 of exact formula> in exported
records; reusing a catalog key cannot impersonate the built-in object.
bernardi_coefficients(jet, gamma=g, inverse=False) applies
a_n -> (g+1)*a_n/(g+n) for exact rational g>=0, on one to eight exact
coefficients a2..a9. This is the normalized Bernardi integral
I_g f=(g+1)*z**(-g)*integral_0^z t**(g-1)*f(t) dt, equivalently defined
by its series. The identity z*F'+g*F=(g+1)*f anchors the convention;
g=0 gives integral_0^z f(t)/t dt, not f.
euler_differential_coefficients(jet, second=a, first=b, inverse=False)
applies the normalized Euler differential expression a*z**2*f''+b*z*f'+(1-b)*f
with exact rational a,b to a2..a9 (length1..8). Inverse mode divides the
multipliers 1+b*(n-1)+a*n*(n-1) and rejects a zero multiplier, even for a zero
input coefficient. This is coefficientwise inversion, not functional inversion,
analytic continuation, univalence, preservation or a global bound. Generic
polynomial differentiation independently anchors the convention; a literature
application is DOI10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300432 Eq8/10 at m0.
q_al_oboudi_coefficients(jet, q=q, lam=L, degree=m, inverse=False)
applies [1+(n-1)*L]_q**m, not [n*L]_q**m or
(1+L*([n]_q-1))**m. Parameters are exact rational 0<q<=1, integer
L=1..64, integer m=0..64, and one to eight exact coefficients. At L=1
this is the iterated Jackson Euler operator; q=1 is the classical limit.
Noninteger lambda is deliberately unsupported. Both inverses divide the
multipliers; neither means functional inversion. Both return bare exact tuples,
not global membership, preservation, univalence, tail or bound certificates.
Source applications: DOI10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.89311, Definition2.3 Eq(2)-(3),
and DOI10.5269/bspm.79733
Eq(1.3)-(1.5). Formula discrepancies in either paper are not endorsed.
owa_fractional_coefficients(jet, rho=rho, inverse=False) applies
Gamma(n+1)*Gamma(2-rho)/Gamma(n+1-rho) to initial a2..a9, length1..8,
for an exact rational 0<=rho<=1. It is the normalized operator
Omega^rho f=Gamma(2-rho)*z^rho*D^rho f; rho0 is identity and rho1 is the
endpoint z*f', not an iterated fractional derivative. A finite rational product
avoids numerical gamma evaluation. inverse=True divides these multipliers,
not functional reversion. The bare exact tuple certifies no global analyticity,
univalence, preservation, omitted tail or source theorem. Source applications:
DOI10.5269/bspm.79103 Eq1.7 and DOI10.5269/bspm.79357 Definition1.2.
linear_subordination_coefficients(B, gammas, alpha=alpha, order=N) returns
a2..a_(N+1) for (1-alpha)f/z + alpha*f' = phi(omega) with exact rational
0 <= alpha <= 1. At alpha=1 this is bounded turning, not convexity;
at alpha=0 it is f/z subordination. It recovers the composed generator via
the existing starlike recurrence rather than maintaining another Schur engine.
Real rational Schur parameters, depth five, order eight, polynomial treatment
of omitted B entries, and caller-owned analytic hypotheses are unchanged.
logarithmic_coefficients([a2,...,a5]) accepts one to four exact coefficients
and returns the corresponding signed gamma1..gamma4 with
log(f(z)/z)=2 sum gamma_n*z^n. For example:
import sympy as sp
from geometric_function_atlas import linear_subordination_coefficients, logarithmic_coefficients
jet = linear_subordination_coefficients([1,0,-sp.Rational(1,3)], [1], alpha=1, order=3)
assert jet == (sp.Rational(1,2), 0, -sp.Rational(1,12)) # f'=1+tanh(z)
assert logarithmic_coefficients([2,3,4]) == (1,sp.Rational(1,2),sp.Rational(1,3))Both return exact tuples only, not theorem certification, global extremization, whole-function tail declarations, or newly released CLI commands.
mixed_derivative_coefficients(B, gammas, alpha=alpha, order=N) solves the
different, nonlinear equation (1-alpha)f' + alpha*(1+zf''/f')=phi(omega).
Alpha is an exact rational in [0,1]; endpoints are bounded turning and convexity.
The triangular formal solution at interior alpha does not certify analytic
continuation or nonvanishing of f' on the whole disk.
product_subordination_coefficients(base, B, gammas, order=N) returns the jet of
f=g*phi(omega), with exactly N exact base coefficients [b2,...,b_(N+1)].
For example, a Koebe base [2,3,4], sine B=[1,0,-Rational(1,6)] and [1]
(omega=z) returns (3,5,Rational(41,6)); this is not sine starlikeness.
Both reuse real Schur composition, with depth five/order eight, return exact
bare tuples and certify no global bound, univalence, unknown tail or theorem.
ruscheweyh_coefficients([a2,...,a9], degree=m, inverse=False) applies
D^m f = z + sum binomial(m+n-1,n-1)*a_n*z^n to a nonempty exact jet
of length at most eight, for integer 0 <= m <= 64. inverse=True divides
by those multipliers; it is not functional inversion. For example,
ruscheweyh_coefficients([1,1,1], degree=2) returns (3,6,10).
Independent differentiation of z/m! * (z^(m-1)*f)^(m) anchors the convention.
This API returns exact tuples only, not global membership, univalence, unknown
tail, or theorem certification. Source application: DOI10.5269/bspm.83160 (1.4).
q_starlike_member_coefficients(B, gammas, q=q, order=N) solves the formal
coefficient equation z*D_q f/f=phi(omega), where
D_q f=(f(z)-f(q*z))/((1-q)*z). Exact rational 0<q<=1 is required;
q=1 is the ordinary derivative limit. It reuses real Schur composition
(depth five, order eight, omitted B entries mean a polynomial generator).
The coefficient divisor is [n+1]_q-1, not n or [n]_q.
q_ruscheweyh_coefficients(jet, q=q, degree=m, inverse=False) applies
[m+n-1]_q!/([m]_q!*[n-1]_q!) to a2..a9. Integer degree0..64 only;
noninteger q-gamma conventions are not implemented. inverse=True divides
multipliers, not functional inversion. At q=1 this equals the ordinary API.
For example, q=1/2, degree1 maps [1,1,1] to (3/2,7/4,15/8).
Existing exact-expression resource bounds still apply to input jets.
These return bare exact tuples, not global q-starlikeness, analyticity, nonvanishing, univalence, bounds, or unknown-tail certificates. In particular, the triangular q-difference solution can have poles in the disk; a finite jet alone does not establish class membership. Source application: DOI10.5269/bspm.81781 Definition1.1/1.2; this does not endorse its formulas.
import sympy as sp
from geometric_function_atlas import (
Generator, convex_member_coefficients, generator_series,
inverse_logarithmic_coefficients, z,
)
apple = Generator(key="apple", name="Apple-like", expression=sp.exp(z)*sp.sqrt(1+z),
citation="arXiv:2606.15780v1, Theorem 3.1, equations (3.1)-(3.3)")
B = generator_series(apple, order=3).coefficients
jet = convex_member_coefficients(B, [1], order=3) # omega(z)=z
assert jet == (sp.Rational(3,4), sp.Rational(25,48), sp.Rational(385,1152))
assert inverse_logarithmic_coefficients(jet) == (
-sp.Rational(3,8), sp.Rational(31,192), -sp.Rational(205,2304),
)convex_member_coefficients reuses the bounded Schur recurrence and Alexander's
identity, returning [a2,...,a_(order+1)] for 1+zf''/f'=phi(omega).
Schur parameters are exact real rationals, not arbitrary complex parameters;
order is at most eight, depth at most five. Supply every B1..B_order for a
nonpolynomial generator. Missing entries have the existing polynomial-generator
meaning, not an unknown-tail guarantee. Admissibility of a custom generator is
not certified by this transform.
inverse_logarithmic_coefficients([a2,...]) accepts one to four preconstructed
exact coefficients and returns signed Gamma1..Gamma4 under the convention
log(f^(-1)(w)/w)=2*sum(Gamma_n*w^n). It rejects strings, floats, infinities,
and booleans. Symbolic coefficients are permitted. Formal local reversion does
not prove global univalence or a disk of inversion. Both operations return bare
SymPy tuples (no CLI envelope), as permitted for low-level exact helpers; they
compute finite jets, not full Taylor polynomials, sharp bounds, or source-paper
validation. Keep source/page/PDF hashes and theorem evidence in the caller's
research manifest. Released snapshots and evidence schemas are unchanged.
from geometric_function_atlas import fekete_szego
# Exact sharp constant under the declared Ma–Minda assumptions.
result = fekete_szego("exponential", mu=0)
assert str(result.value) == "3/4"
print(result.to_dict())The website's verification sandbox exposes three cost tiers. The package mirrors them with explicit epistemic labels: a numerical screen is never presented as a proof.
from geometric_function_atlas import verify_function
# Screen: float grid evaluation of the starlikeness criterion.
screen = verify_function([0.25], property="starlike", max_cost="screen")
assert screen.outcome == "passes_screen" # numerical screen, not a proof
# Symbolic: exact arithmetic on a sufficient condition.
# For a finite polynomial, sum(n*|a_n|) <= 1 proves starlikeness.
proof = verify_function([0.1], property="starlike", max_cost="symbolic")
# Rigorous: symbolic checks plus certified interval evaluation at the
# worst screened point.
rigorous = verify_function([1.0], property="starlike", max_cost="rigorous")
assert rigorous.outcome == "certified_violation"verify_function accepts either coefficients ([a2, a3, ...] for
f(z) = z + a2*z**2 + ...) or a preconstructed SymPy closed_form expression.
Supported properties: starlike, convex, univalent, becker_univalent,
nehari_univalent. Univalence has no pointwise screen; use the symbolic tier
or the Becker/Nehari criteria. Convexity proofs require the Alexander sum
sum(n²|a_n|) <= 1, not merely the C01 starlikeness sum sum(n|a_n|) <= 1.
For becker_univalent and nehari_univalent, a symbolic proven result is
univalence via C01, not a proof of the named Becker/Nehari criterion;
an interval-certified certified_violation disproves only that sufficient
criterion, not univalence. A screen is never a proof. An unknown Taylor
tail (truncation=True or a nonpolynomial closed_form) cannot transfer a
point interval or partial-sum proof to the full function. Closed-form symbolic
proofs use the original SymPy coefficients, not their binary64 grid approximations;
point intervals on rounded coefficients remain non-certifying.
Verification records include canonical_inputs.closed_form_srepr: the exact
SymPy structural representation of a supplied closed_form (up to 65,536
characters), or null for coefficient input and CLI gfa verify. This keeps
different functions with identical first 39 Taylor coefficients distinct in
the record. It is data for identification, not a formula to evaluate or
parse from untrusted JSON; compare it within a pinned SymPy version if relying
on byte-for-byte identity. Longer representations raise ResourceLimitError.
from geometric_function_atlas import find_counterexample, verify_counterexample
# Rigorously re-check the website's witness z = -3/4 for f(z) = z + z^2.
check = verify_counterexample([1.0], point=(-0.75, 0.0), property="starlike")
assert check.certified is True
print(check.to_dict())
# Grid search locates a candidate violation, interval arithmetic certifies it.
search = find_counterexample([1.0], property="starlike")
assert search.certified is TrueMa–Minda class operations are screens unless a certified theorem is attached: exact normalization checks plus sampled-region evaluation. They are never presented as proofs.
from geometric_function_atlas import (
class_admissibility,
class_containment_screen,
class_extremal_coefficients,
class_member_screen,
list_classes,
)
list_classes() # all 39 catalog keys
class_admissibility("exponential") # exact phi(0)=1, phi'(0)>0 + region screens
# Screen f(z) = z + 0.25 z^2 + 0.1 z^3 for membership in S*(exp(z)).
member = class_member_screen("exponential", [0.25, 0.1])
assert member.member is True
# Screen phi_inner(D) subset phi_outer(D).
contained = class_containment_screen("exponential", "cardioid")
# Exact extremal coefficients from the class definition.
coeffs = class_extremal_coefficients("exponential", order=8)
# The same Python APIs accept the exact custom Generator constructed above.
custom_admissibility = class_admissibility(custom)
custom_coeffs = class_extremal_coefficients(custom, order=8)See docs/workflows/custom_class.md for an
end-to-end caller-defined class with exact coefficient bounds, explicitly
labeled screens, and separate phi, z*phi, and f_phi exports.
Four plot kinds reproduce the website's plots as dependency-free SVG:
domain (conformal grid image), coefficients (coefficient magnitudes),
real-part (heatmap of Re f), and phase (phase portrait).
A named generator can be plotted as three genuinely different objects, chosen
with object= in Python or --object on the command line:
phi— the generator itself,phi(z) = 1 + B_1 z + B_2 z^2 + .... Its constant term is 1 and its linear coefficient isB_1(not necessarily 1), so it is not a normalizedz + ...polynomial.z*phi— the normalized truncationz*phi(z) = z + B_1 z^2 + ..., the legacy default when no object is selected.f_phi— the canonical Ma–Minda extremalf_phi(z) = z exp(integral_0^z (phi(t) - 1)/t dt) = z + a_2 z^2 + ..., computed withclass_extremal_coefficients()and kept exact until the plotting conversion boundary.
from geometric_function_atlas import write_plot
write_plot("domain", "/tmp/exponential-domain.svg", generator="exponential")
write_plot("domain", "/tmp/exponential-phi.svg", generator="exponential", object="phi")
write_plot("domain", "/tmp/exponential-fphi.svg", generator="exponential", object="f_phi")The same selection on the command line (quote z*phi so the shell does not
expand the *):
gfa plot domain exponential --object phi --output phi-domain.svg
gfa plot domain exponential --object 'z*phi' --output zphi-domain.svg
gfa plot domain exponential --object f_phi --output fphi-domain.svg--coefficients continues to mean the normalized polynomial
f(z) = z + a2 z^2 + ...; it is rejected together with --object rather than
silently reinterpreted. Results label this input as normalized_polynomial;
that metadata value is not a fourth --object choice. Unknown object names are
rejected and list the three accepted spellings.
Every plot is a sampled finite-truncation visualization of the selected
object at a fixed Taylor order (further capped at order 24 for f_phi). It is
not a proof, not the full image domain, and not a certificate of class
membership; the real-part and phase outputs are numerical screens only.
The checked-in examples below are generated by the package itself:
The website's proof, bounds, expansion, open-problem, reconciliation, and reference records are shipped as a checksummed read-only package snapshot. These are lookups or bounded certificate replays; they do not turn a numerical screen into a proof, an enclosure into a sharp result, or a literature no-match into a novelty claim.
from geometric_function_atlas import (
coefficient_bound,
expansion,
get_proof,
list_proofs,
open_problems,
reconciliation,
snapshot_info,
snapshot_verify,
verify_certificate,
)
artifact = snapshot_info()
assert artifact["artifact_version"]
assert snapshot_verify()["checks"]["success"] is True
assert expansion("starlike")["class_key"] == "starlike"
assert coefficient_bound("starlike")["count"] > 0
assert list_proofs()["count"] > 0
assert get_proof("starlike__fekete_szego_mu1")["name"]
assert open_problems("enclosure")["counts"]["enclosures"] == 12
assert reconciliation()["total"] > 0
assert verify_certificate("starlike__fekete_szego_mu1")["matched"] is TrueThe corresponding commands are:
gfa artifact-snapshot info --json
gfa artifact-snapshot verify --json
gfa artifact-classes --json
gfa class starlike --json
gfa expansion starlike --json
gfa coefficient-bound starlike --json
gfa proofs --search fekete --json
gfa proof starlike__fekete_szego_mu1 --json
gfa open-problems --kind enclosure --json
gfa reconciliation --json
gfa references --json
gfa verify-certificate starlike__fekete_szego_mu1 --json
gfa verify-certificate booth_0.3__fekete_szego_mu0.25 --json
gfa coefficient-table hankel3_1 --json
gfa coefficient-table a3 --json
gfa coefficient-table a2a3 --jsonRadius rows preserve direction. The 2026.09.27-paper-review snapshot adds
paper_proved_exact for 19 directed radii cited to written manuscript theorems;
it does not mutate the published 0.4.0 snapshot. Eight reviewed lanes have
package-owned replay certificates. Two reciprocal paper lanes now check bounded
symbolic identities, but not the written global-containment arguments; they
report symbolic_replay_only, certified: false, and
global_containment_check: not_mechanized. The other nine written-proof lanes
remain unsupported for local replay. Six axis contacts have numerical recognition,
not a global containment or sharpness certificate. The 39 catalog keys represent
38 distinct formulas, but the 702 raw radius rows span only a bounded
28-source × 26-target key grid, not every ordered pair of the catalog.
Canonical alias/self-pair accounting yields 650
questions and 557 eligible closed-form-consistent questions. Twelve raw rows
remain audit_required consistency failures (11 in the canonical off-diagonal
view); neither the raw nor canonical count is a proof tally. The 0.4.0 release
snapshot is frozen; the package repository's installers now target the published
0.7.0 wheel.
from geometric_function_atlas import (
audit_radius,
identify_radius,
list_radii,
radius,
recompute_radius,
replay_radius_certificate,
verify_radius_attainment,
verify_radius_certificate,
)
rows = list_radii(status="audit_required")
record = radius("sine", "sigmoid")
assert record.direction == "sine->sigmoid"
assert replay_radius_certificate(record).certified is True
assert verify_radius_certificate("sine", "sigmoid").certified is True
assert recompute_radius("sine", "sigmoid").certified is True
assert identify_radius("asin((E-1)/(E+1)") == () # malformed input is not a match
assert audit_radius("sine", "sigmoid")["attainment_verified"] is True
assert verify_radius_attainment("sine", "sigmoid").certified is Truegfa radii --status audit_required --json
gfa radius sine sigmoid --json
gfa radius-recompute sine sigmoid --json
gfa radius-identify --value 'asin((E-1)/(E+1))' --json
gfa radius-audit sine sigmoid --json
gfa radius-attainment sine sigmoid --json
gfa verify-radius-certificate sine sigmoid --jsonThe radius certificate replay checks the declared branch, containment,
contact/attainment evidence, exact candidate, and bounded symbolic steps. The
closed replay JSON contract is schema/radius-replay.schema.json, not the
generic result.schema.json; see the exact validator call.
Eight historical lanes report global_containment_check: bounded_chain_replayed
for their bounded checks (not a fully formalized global theorem); other routes
report not_mechanized. A
stored decimal or a candidate expression is not silently upgraded to a global
sharpness proof. An unchanged snapshot row without a bundled replay route
is reported as not_replayable (unsupported, exit code 3) and keeps its own
evidence status; a malformed record, a certificate removed from a reviewed
lane, or any other record that is not its unchanged trusted snapshot row is
corrupt_artifact.
The large relational registry database is a separately distributed artifact; it is not embedded in the wheel. After obtaining a database and its matching manifest, inspect and verify it before querying:
gfa snapshot info registry.sqlite --manifest registry-manifest.json --json
gfa snapshot verify registry.sqlite --manifest registry-manifest.json --json
gfa snapshot install registry.sqlite installed.sqlite --manifest registry-manifest.json --jsonAll local snapshot queries use RegistrySnapshot.open(...) and have matching
task-oriented commands:
| Operation | Command | Python API |
|---|---|---|
| Statistics | gfa stats SNAPSHOT |
snapshot.stats() |
| Search | gfa search QUERY SNAPSHOT |
snapshot.search() |
| Family list/detail | gfa families, gfa family ID |
snapshot.families(), snapshot.family() |
| Facts/evidence/runs | gfa facts, gfa evidence, gfa runs |
snapshot.facts(), snapshot.evidence(), snapshot.runs() |
| Paper search/detail | gfa papers, gfa paper ID |
snapshot.papers(), snapshot.paper() |
| Applications | gfa applications [AREA] |
snapshot.applications() |
| Stored witnesses | gfa counterexamples [FAMILY] |
snapshot.counterexamples() |
| Alias lookup | gfa aliases [TEXT], gfa normalize-class TEXT |
snapshot.aliases(), snapshot.normalize_class() |
| Property hierarchy | gfa hierarchy [PROPERTY] |
snapshot.hierarchy() |
Snapshot query results preserve corpus facts, evidence, verification-run metadata, and conservative application associations. Application labels are literature/keyword associations, not effectiveness claims.
The Cryptography Lab and Image Lab operations live behind the lab extra.
Crypto outputs are benchmark metrics, never security claims; image outputs
are empirical.
from geometric_function_atlas.lab import AES_SBOX, IDENTITY_SBOX, sbox_metrics
# Deterministic anchors: the AES S-box and the identity permutation.
aes = sbox_metrics(AES_SBOX) # NL 112, DP 4/256, LP 1/16, ...
identity = sbox_metrics(IDENTITY_SBOX) # poor metrics by construction
from geometric_function_atlas.lab import image_metrics, sample_image
ref = sample_image(seed=0, size=32) # deterministic generated array
metrics = image_metrics(ref, ref) # PSNR inf, SSIM 1, GMSD 0See docs/WEB_PARITY.md for the website-to-package checklist and
docs/PROVENANCE.md for claim semantics. The versioned result envelope,
verification checks, failure states, and CLI exit codes are specified in
docs/RESULT_CONTRACT.md.
gfa generators
gfa coefficients sine --order 5
gfa fekete-szego exponential --mu 1/2
# Re-check the witness z=-3/4 for f(z)=z+z².
gfa verify-counterexample --coefficients "1" --point=-0.75,0
# Search for and certify a starlikeness violation.
gfa find-counterexample --coefficients "1"
# Tiered verification.
gfa verify --coefficients "1" --property starlike --max-cost screen
gfa verify --coefficients "1" --property starlike --max-cost symbolic
gfa verify --coefficients "1" --property starlike --max-cost rigorous
# Class operations.
gfa classes
gfa class-check exponential
gfa class-member exponential --coefficients "0.25,0.1"
gfa compare exponential cardioid
gfa extremal-coefficients exponential --order 8
# Plots (SVG for every kind; domain PNG and domain TikZ exports are also supported).
gfa plot sine --order 12 --output sine-domain.svg
gfa plot domain exponential --output /tmp/domain.svg
gfa plot domain exponential --object phi --output /tmp/domain-phi.svg
gfa plot domain exponential --object f_phi --output /tmp/domain-fphi.svg
gfa plot phase exponential --output /tmp/phase.svg
gfa plot domain exponential --output /tmp/domain.png
gfa plot domain exponential --output /tmp/domain.tikz
# Optional labs (NumPy required).
gfa crypto-lab metrics --reference aes
gfa crypto-lab metrics --reference identity
gfa crypto-lab metrics --sbox "25,1,47,..." # 256 integers
gfa crypto-lab construct cardioid
gfa crypto-lab leaderboard --scope website
gfa image-lab sample --output ref.npy --seed 0 --size 32
gfa image-lab metrics --ref ref.npy --test ref.npy
gfa image-lab transform --input ref.npy --output out.npy --operation edgeThe longer command name, geometric-function-atlas, is also supported. Add
--json to result-printing commands when machine-readable output is useful.
Snapshot citation and facet commands are local queries over the caller-supplied immutable snapshot:
gfa citation --key example --title "Example paper" --year 2024 --author "A. Author"
gfa function legacy-sine --snapshot registry.sqlite --json
gfa functions --snapshot registry.sqlite --tag image_processing --json
gfa paper-facets --snapshot registry.sqlite --json
gfa tags --snapshot registry.sqlite --category application --json--mu accepts an exact signed integer or integer/integer fraction. Decimal
and scientific notation are rejected so untrusted short inputs cannot trigger
unbounded symbolic integer construction.
uv sync --extra test
uv run pytestEvery result reports its method and evidence status. Numerical screens are never presented as proofs, computational certification is distinct from literature novelty, enclosures are not sharpness claims, application tags are not effectiveness claims, crypto metrics are benchmark metrics rather than security claims, and bibliographic review remains a separate human process.
MIT