fix(docs): restore pre-activation billing guidance - #50
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited based on label configuration. 🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 36af3ff1e9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| ## Request an increase | ||
|
|
||
| Free limits are hard constraints. When a Free team reaches one, the app prompts the owner to upgrade to Pro instead of sending an increase request to an administrator. | ||
| When a resource reaches **80%** of its current limit, Sendmux shows **Request increase** near the usage text on that page. API clients can request more sending-account capacity with `POST /providers/limits/sending-accounts/request-increase`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Qualify increase requests by team eligibility
For a Free team whose resource has reached 80% but is not eligible for an increase, this promises that Request increase will appear and that the API can submit the request. This conflicts with the existing release guidance, which says increases are available only “where the option is available” (changelog.mdx:81), and with the committed API schema’s 403 response for an ineligible team (openapi-app.json:15864). Preserve the eligibility qualifier and direct ineligible teams to support instead.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L3-L5
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Scope
Verification
npm test(3 tests)npm run confidentiality:checknpm run external-links:checknpm run postman:checkmint validatemint broken-links