DOC-920 | Add structured data markup - #1038
Open
nicos-arango wants to merge 11 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
Deploy Preview Available Via |
Contributor
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new Hugo partial generates JSON-LD structured data from page and site metadata, choosing ChangesJSON-LD Structured Data
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@site/themes/arangodb-docs-theme/layouts/partials/structured-data.html`:
- Around line 17-26: The opt-out check for `schema: none` is only applied within
the `.IsPage` branch, preventing the home page (`.IsHome`) from opting out of
schema generation. Move the condition that checks `ne (lower (.Params.schema |
default "")) "none"` to wrap around both the `.IsHome` and `.IsPage` blocks, or
alternatively add this same opt-out check inside the `.IsHome` block before the
schema assignment to ensure both page types respect the `schema: none`
configuration.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9d9d0ef6-80c7-46b0-9575-c48fbdfd9d8f
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
site/themes/arangodb-docs-theme/layouts/partials/head.htmlsite/themes/arangodb-docs-theme/layouts/partials/structured-data.html
Simran-B
requested changes
Jun 25, 2026
Simran-B
reviewed
Jul 3, 2026
|
Bugbot is not enabled for this team, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
Contributor
|
Note GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@site/themes/arangodb-docs-theme/layouts/partials/structured-data.html`:
- Around line 23-27: The structured-data branch currently assigns TechArticle to
both .IsPage and .IsSection. Update the conditional around the $schema
assignment so TechArticle remains limited to .IsPage, and provide .IsSection
with an appropriate section or collection schema type without article-specific
properties such as headline, author, or mainEntityOfPage.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 1ff5ed08-8647-4d9e-acae-c29186480c9f
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
site/themes/arangodb-docs-theme/layouts/partials/head.htmlsite/themes/arangodb-docs-theme/layouts/partials/structured-data.html
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- site/themes/arangodb-docs-theme/layouts/partials/head.html
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Upstream PRs
Summary by CodeRabbit
WebSiteschema for the homepage andTechArticleschema for content and section pages.