Skip to content

oomph memory allocation performance #18

Description

@angainor

There seem to be quite large overheads connected with oomph memory allocation. Ideally, performance should be the same in those two scenarios:

  1. halo exchange with static, pre-allocated messages
  2. halo exchange with messages allocated each time and moved into the oomph send/recv routines
    This seems not to be the case now: ghexbench has much lower performance in the second case. We should debug and improve.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions