Use bazelisk for amd64 as well - #2981
Conversation
We curl this URL, which is now broken. google#2981 is considering using bazelisk, but the scripts and presubmits are broken now, so we should fix this now.
We curl this URL, which is now broken. #2981 is considering using bazelisk, but the scripts and presubmits are broken now, so we should fix this now.
We curl this URL, which is now broken. google#2981 is considering using bazelisk, but the scripts and presubmits are broken now, so we should fix this now.
6fe02b9 to
209b5b2
Compare
We curl this URL, which is now broken. #2981 is considering using bazelisk, but the scripts and presubmits are broken now, so we should fix this now.
We curl this URL, which is now broken. google#2981 is considering using bazelisk, but the scripts and presubmits are broken now, so we should fix this now.
We curl this URL, which is now broken. #2981 is considering using bazelisk, but the scripts and presubmits are broken now, so we should fix this now.
|
@monkey-jsun has been working on building/running the host tools on riscv64, and it looks like the bazelisk |
I think it's out of scope of this PR? So far, |
|
The possibly breaking change is that this PR updates |
|
My temporary solution for riscv64 is to give instruction on building riscv64 by yourself and bail out early. (ignore the polluted marker lines) |
|
Thanks for sharing how riscv64 will install bazel. I updated |
|
Sorry, also comes to mind that @grandpaul is working on a strategy to make this build self-contained where Can't think of issues beyond that. |
No worries, checking everything is important than just merging PR, especially for this one. I don't know Paul's strategy yet though, I believe the new strategy wouldn't be keeping diverged bazel installation mechanism between arch.(bazel for amd64, bazelisk for arm64) Not yet certain if the direction should be applying bazelisk on amd64 or dropping bazelisk on arm64, depending on his answer. |
No description provided.