fix(datagen): align merge with live schema, surface close errors, tolerate drained generations - #200
Merged
Conversation
… tolerate drained generations Three fixes that the rollout store received but `DatagenStore` never did. All three are latent today and become reachable as soon as datagen sees concurrent or long-lived use. 1. Merge built its append batch against the compile-time `datagen_log_schema()` rather than the live dataset schema. A base table written by an older binary can lack columns the current schema has, and merging a batch built from the compile-time schema into it fails outright. Now aligned via `align_batch_to_schema`, matching the rollout store (which hit exactly this). 2. `Drop` swallowed the writer's close error (`let _ = writer.close().await`). A failed close leaks the writer's background tasks and, if the memtable was still buffered, strands rows that are durable in the WAL but never sealed -- with no signal anywhere. Now logged, and the no-runtime path says so too. 3. A generation drained and deleted by a concurrent merge between taking the snapshot and opening it made `get_blob` fail the whole lookup. Those rows are already in the base table, so it now skips the generation and falls through, as the rollout store does. `align_batch_to_schema` and `is_not_found_error` become `pub(crate)` so both stores share one implementation instead of drifting again. Also adds a test that a merge does not fence the store's own resident writer, so an append immediately after a merge still succeeds. Note on scope: I originally expected datagen to have the write-lock stall fixed in lance-format#199, but it does not. `DatagenStore::append` is already `&mut self` (its writer is a bare `Option<ShardWriter>`, not behind a mutex), so appends need the exclusive lock regardless of merge, and `write_with_resident_writer` already retries on fence. Restoring `claim_epoch` leaves the new test green, confirming the fence is genuinely handled there. Datagen is also not yet wired into any server route or sweeper. So the epoch change from lance-format#199 is not ported here; these three divergences are the real defects. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Three fixes the rollout store received but
DatagenStorenever did. Each is latent today and becomes reachable as soon as datagen sees concurrent or long-lived use.1. Merge used the compile-time schema, not the live one
merge_own_shardbuilt its append batch fromdatagen_log_schema(). A base table written by an older binary can lack columns the current schema has, and merging a batch built from the compile-time schema into it fails outright. Now aligned viaalign_batch_to_schema— the rollout store hit exactly this and was fixed in #175.2.
Dropswallowed the writer's close errorA failed close leaks the writer's background tasks and, if the memtable was still buffered, strands rows that are durable in the WAL but never sealed — with no signal anywhere. Now logged, and the no-runtime path says so too. (Rollout equivalent: #190.)
3. A concurrently-drained generation failed the whole lookup
get_blobpropagated not-found when a merge drained and deleted a generation between snapshot and open. Those rows are already in the base table, so it now skips and falls through — as the rollout store does.Sharing
align_batch_to_schemaandis_not_found_errorbecomepub(crate)so both stores share one implementation instead of drifting again. This drift is the actual pattern here: all three bugs are cases where rollout was fixed and datagen was not.Scope note — worth reading
I expected datagen to have the write-lock stall fixed in #199. It does not, and I verified rather than assumed:
DatagenStore::appendis already&mut self(its writer is a bareOption<ShardWriter>, not behind a mutex), so appends need the exclusive lock regardless of merge — the read/write lock split from fix(rollout): stop WAL merge from blocking concurrent appends #199 would buy nothing.write_with_resident_writeralready retries on fence, soclaim_epochfencing its own writer is handled. Restoringclaim_epochleaves the new test green, confirming this empirically.So the epoch change from #199 is deliberately not ported. These three divergences are the real defects.
Testing
New test asserts a merge does not fence the store's own resident writer, so an append immediately after a merge still succeeds and both rows stay readable, and a second merge still converges.
9 datagen tests pass;
clippy --all-targets -D warningsandcargo fmtclean.🤖 Generated with Claude Code