Skip to content

client: sign container requests with explicit signer - #898

Merged
roman-khimov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/sign-container-requests-with-explicit-signer
Oct 26, 2026
Merged

roman-khimov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/sign-container-requests-with-explicit-signer

Conversation

@carpawell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

These cases are special, they require any signature routine to be done by container owner, that is why it is passed as a func param. In particular, it allows nspcc-dev/neofs-node#4245 exchanging container, containerID, and container eACL signatures with the whole request signatures. Refs nspcc-dev/neofs-api#446.

These cases are special, they require any signature routine to be done by
container owner, that is why it is passed as a func param. In particular, it
allows nspcc-dev/neofs-node#4245 exchanging container,
containerID, and container eACL signatures with the whole request signatures.
Refs nspcc-dev/neofs-api#446.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.io>
@carpawell
carpawell force-pushed the fix/sign-container-requests-with-explicit-signer branch from 39f001b to df56a08 Compare October 23, 2026 15:01
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 37.50000% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 61.35%. Comparing base (6b81124) to head (df56a08).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crypto/test/tests.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #898   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.34%   61.35%           
=======================================
  Files         177      177           
  Lines       17194    17216   +22     
=======================================
+ Hits        10548    10563   +15     
- Misses       6646     6653    +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

carpawell added a commit to nspcc-dev/neofs-node that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2026
It now has container RPC signed by container owner (or by an authorized key) and
allows IRs checking original requests by its signatures, not by request fields.
Refs nspcc-dev/neofs-api#446,
nspcc-dev/neofs-sdk-go#898.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.io>
@carpawell
carpawell marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2026 19:04
@roman-khimov
roman-khimov merged commit e754fb0 into master Oct 26, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed
@roman-khimov
roman-khimov deleted the fix/sign-container-requests-with-explicit-signer branch October 26, 2026 12:45
carpawell added a commit to nspcc-dev/neofs-node that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2026
It now has container RPC signed by container owner (or by an authorized key) and
allows IRs checking original requests by its signatures, not by request fields.
Refs nspcc-dev/neofs-api#446,
nspcc-dev/neofs-sdk-go#898.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.io>
carpawell added a commit to nspcc-dev/neofs-node that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2026
It now has container RPC signed by container owner (or by an authorized key) and
allows IRs checking original requests by its signatures, not by request fields.
Refs nspcc-dev/neofs-api#446,
nspcc-dev/neofs-sdk-go#898.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.io>
carpawell added a commit to nspcc-dev/neofs-node that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2026
It now has container RPC signed by container owner (or by an authorized key) and
allows IRs checking original requests by its signatures, not by request fields.
Refs nspcc-dev/neofs-api#446,
nspcc-dev/neofs-sdk-go#898.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants