Skip to content

discussion: esm-only #50

Description

@gameroman

What is your opinion on going ESM-only?

This would require a new major version

If you are happy with that, I would be very glad to help!

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions