Skip to content

Revert accidental arkworks 0.6 manifest update on v1 - #278

Merged
dcbuild3r merged 1 commit into
v1from
dcbuilder/revert-arkworks-0.6-v1
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

Revert accidental arkworks 0.6 manifest update on v1#278
dcbuild3r merged 1 commit into
v1from
dcbuilder/revert-arkworks-0.6-v1

Conversation

@dcbuild3r

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reverts #277. That release preparation was based on the current v1 tip instead of the exact source of published provekit-whir 0.1.1, so it bundled unrelated post-release protocol changes. No provekit-whir 0.2.0 crate was published. A corrected maintenance release will be prepared from commit 4469b8e8a024c42f5e8cf1167921995ec6a2178e.

@dcbuild3r
dcbuild3r merged commit 25ae778 into v1 Sep 8, 2026
1 check passed
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 18.76%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 6 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 22 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
interleaved_rs_encode[(20, 4, 4)] 612.8 ms 807.9 ms -24.15%
interleaved_rs_encode[(18, 2, 2)] 68.8 ms 86.2 ms -20.17%
interleaved_rs_encode[(22, 4, 4)] 3.4 s 4.1 s -16.93%
interleaved_rs_encode[(18, 4, 3)] 155.3 ms 179.3 ms -13.4%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing dcbuilder/revert-arkworks-0.6-v1 (b9bdc2b) with main (c03a4a5)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 22 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on v1 (f87bfab) during the generation of this report, so main (c03a4a5) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant