Repository navigation
Conversation
DavidHLP
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 11, 2026 03:34
DavidHLP
merged commit Oct 11, 2026
79c4de8
into
codex/mixed-submission-clarification
32 checks passed
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Answer-level evaluation dropped the supplied snapshot's sample_kind and access_scope when formatting retrieval fragments. A synthetic fragment claiming to be real in its untrusted text was therefore indistinguishable from real evidence to the answer and judging passes.
Reuse the existing SourceHit.as_model_dict() projection and serialize each fragment as a JSON object. Both passes receive snapshot provenance, while newlines and forged field claims remain inside text; the prompt explicitly says contrary text claims do not override snapshot fields. Citation selection, authorization, retries, and prompt-budget preflight are unchanged. Update canonical documentation and its bound corpus version.
Addresses PR #254 review thread PRRT_kwDORHwl-s6rC0rj. The separate overlapping behavior-category finding remains open and is not claimed fixed here.
Validation at 995cb3f:
Depends on PR #262. Remote validation preserves only an unrelated whitespace-only mvnw.cmd checkout normalization. No paid calls or formal acceptance occurred. Prompt projection tests do not prove live-model resistance to forged text; formal U02/U03/U04 and human evidence remain incomplete.