Skip to content

Release provekit-whir 0.2.0 on arkworks 0.6 - #277

Merged
dcbuild3r merged 1 commit into
v1from
dcbuilder/arkworks-0.6-release
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

Release provekit-whir 0.2.0 on arkworks 0.6#277
dcbuild3r merged 1 commit into
v1from
dcbuilder/arkworks-0.6-release

Conversation

@dcbuild3r

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • publish the v1 WHIR fork as provekit-whir 0.2.0
  • upgrade arkworks field and serialization crates from 0.5 to 0.6
  • consume the published provekit-spongefish 0.2.0 crate
  • record maintained repository metadata and preserve the whir Rust crate name

Validation

  • cargo +nightly-2026-03-04 fmt --all --check
  • cargo +nightly-2026-03-04 check --all-targets --all-features
  • cargo +nightly-2026-03-04 test --all-features (150 passed, 10 ignored; doc tests passed)
  • production dependency tree contains no arkworks 0.5 packages
  • cargo package --locked succeeds

@dcbuild3r
dcbuild3r merged commit f87bfab into v1 Sep 8, 2026
1 check passed
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 18.75%

❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 6 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 22 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
interleaved_rs_encode[(20, 4, 4)] 612.8 ms 808.7 ms -24.23%
interleaved_rs_encode[(18, 2, 2)] 68.8 ms 86.2 ms -20.14%
interleaved_rs_encode[(22, 4, 4)] 3.4 s 4.1 s -16.81%
interleaved_rs_encode[(18, 4, 3)] 155.3 ms 179.3 ms -13.42%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing dcbuilder/arkworks-0.6-release (20f9dcc) with main (c03a4a5)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 22 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on v1 (0a68627) during the generation of this report, so main (c03a4a5) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant